Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory

Nick Piggin
2008-03-03T05:46:40Z

On Monday 03 March 2008 04:01, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> in general,
> Agreed with we need bad memory treatness.
>
> > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */
>
> some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory.
> Why do you want introduce new page flag?
> for show_mem() improvement?

I'd like to get rid of PG_reserved at some point. So I'd
rather not overload it with more meanings ;)