From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit AMD panic
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:41:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D01EB5.5080101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0803031205030.5874@chaos.analogic.com>
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We have 64-bit production machines that use the kernel shipped with
> a RedHat distribution, linux-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4smp. There have been
> no problems until we received recent hardware. With the latest hardware,
> which the vendor claims hasn't changed, the machines panic when either
> a USB mouse or USB keyboard are plugged in.
>
> Machine:
>
> Supermicro H8DME-2
> Two quad-Core AMD Opteron CPUs
> 64GB DDR2 400 SDRAM
> 6 SATA2 3.0Gb/s HD Support
> 2 64-bit 133/100 MHz PCI-X
> 2 64=bit 100MHz PCI-X
> ATI ES1000 Graphics
>
> Chipset nVida MCP55 Pro
> NEC uPD720400
> USB FUCI, uses ohci_hcd driver.
>
> When mouse or keyboard is inserted, I get a panic with:
> "map_single bounce buffer is not DMA'ble."
>
> This comes from: linux-2.6.11-prep/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c,
> line 440. I added 64-bit long print hex to the panic statement
> so I could display the address it doesn't like.
You're using an Itanium kernel on Opteron?
> The address it doesn't like is: 0x000000022a0aa000
>
> Does anybody have a clue what might be the matter and how to fix it?
If the hardware "didn't change" then it could be a BIOS bug, or just a
different BIOS behavior that your old kernel doesn't handle well. Try
the same version you had on the old hardware. I once had a desktop box
that developed a similar behavior when I twiddled the memory hole
remapping settings in the BIOS.
-- Chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-03 17:06 64-bit AMD panic linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-03-03 18:45 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-03 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 22:10 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-03-03 22:21 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 0:11 ` Jesper Juhl
2008-03-04 14:21 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-03-06 16:41 ` Chris Snook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D01EB5.5080101@redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox