* [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: switch to proc_create()
@ 2008-03-10 7:30 Li Zefan
2008-03-10 21:01 ` Paul Menage
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2008-03-10 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Paul Menage, LKML
There is a race between create_proc_entry() and the assignment
of file ops. proc_create() is invented to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 5 +----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 8d833b6..8d45126 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2489,7 +2489,6 @@ int __init cgroup_init(void)
{
int err;
int i;
- struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
err = bdi_init(&cgroup_backing_dev_info);
if (err)
@@ -2505,9 +2504,7 @@ int __init cgroup_init(void)
if (err < 0)
goto out;
- entry = create_proc_entry("cgroups", 0, NULL);
- if (entry)
- entry->proc_fops = &proc_cgroupstats_operations;
+ proc_create("cgroups", 0, NULL, &proc_cgroupstats_operations);
out:
if (err)
--
1.5.4.rc3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: switch to proc_create()
2008-03-10 7:30 [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: switch to proc_create() Li Zefan
@ 2008-03-10 21:01 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-10 23:43 ` Li Zefan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menage @ 2008-03-10 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zefan; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> There is a race between create_proc_entry() and the assignment
> of file ops. proc_create() is invented to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Doesn't seem to be a serious race since there's nothing in userspace
at this point to read the file. But replacing four lines with one is
generally a good thing.
Paul
> ---
> kernel/cgroup.c | 5 +----
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 8d833b6..8d45126 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -2489,7 +2489,6 @@ int __init cgroup_init(void)
> {
> int err;
> int i;
> - struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
>
> err = bdi_init(&cgroup_backing_dev_info);
> if (err)
> @@ -2505,9 +2504,7 @@ int __init cgroup_init(void)
> if (err < 0)
> goto out;
>
> - entry = create_proc_entry("cgroups", 0, NULL);
> - if (entry)
> - entry->proc_fops = &proc_cgroupstats_operations;
> + proc_create("cgroups", 0, NULL, &proc_cgroupstats_operations);
>
> out:
> if (err)
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: switch to proc_create()
2008-03-10 21:01 ` Paul Menage
@ 2008-03-10 23:43 ` Li Zefan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2008-03-10 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Menage; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> There is a race between create_proc_entry() and the assignment
>> of file ops. proc_create() is invented to fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
>
> Doesn't seem to be a serious race since there's nothing in userspace
> at this point to read the file. But replacing four lines with one is
> generally a good thing.
>
Yes I know, it's a slight race in case of modular code, but the aim is
to replace all the use of create_proc_entry() with proc_create(). :)
> Paul
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-10 23:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-10 7:30 [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: switch to proc_create() Li Zefan
2008-03-10 21:01 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-10 23:43 ` Li Zefan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox