From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Colin Leroy <colin@colino.net>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ADT746X: logical-bitwise & confusion in set_max_duty_at_crit()
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:59:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D5068F.8050709@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64d5b5e6dfd0d1820d21db323ef88e25@kernel.crashing.org>
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c b/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
>> index 9587869..8ea7da2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
>> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static ssize_t set_max_duty_at_crit(struct device
>> *dev,
>> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> struct adt7473_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> int temp = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
>> - temp = temp && 0xFF;
>> + temp &= 0xFF;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
>> data->max_duty_at_overheat = temp;
>
> The & 0xff here is bogus anyway; temp is only ever used as an u8,
> so just declare it as that, or do proper overflow/underflow checking
> on it. The patch will need testing on hardware too, since it changes
> behaviour (it should be a bugfix, but who knows).
Maybe someone can test this?
---
logical-bitwise & confusion
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
---
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c b/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
index 9587869..2a2de73 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/adt7473.c
@@ -566,11 +566,11 @@ static ssize_t set_max_duty_at_crit(struct device *dev,
const char *buf,
size_t count)
{
- u8 reg;
+ u8 reg, temp;
struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
struct adt7473_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
- int temp = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
- temp = temp && 0xFF;
+
+ temp = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10) & 0xFF;
mutex_lock(&data->lock);
data->max_duty_at_overheat = temp;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-10 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-10 0:04 ADT746X: logical-bitwise & confusion in set_max_duty_at_crit() Roel Kluin
2008-03-10 7:46 ` Colin Leroy
2008-03-10 8:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-10 8:22 ` Roel Kluin
2008-03-10 9:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-10 9:59 ` Roel Kluin [this message]
2008-03-10 18:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2008-03-10 21:17 ` Roel Kluin
2008-03-10 21:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-10 22:15 ` Roel Kluin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D5068F.8050709@tiscali.nl \
--to=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=colin@colino.net \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox