From: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:32:17 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D909B9.40701@davidnewall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313073828.GA8781@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:52:11PM +1030, David Newall wrote:
>
>>> FWIW, I thought it was a well deserved "Al" thump.
>>>
>> Hostility such as that gives this list a bad reputation and drives
>> people away. One can (and should) tell people that an idea is
>> completely wrong without being rude.
>>
>> Perhaps I'm just incredibly sensitive today.
>>
>
> Or just dumb. If you're read past post by Mr Bizzaro you'd realize that
> driving him away would be a good thing
This is the sort of comment that gives Linux kernel developers a bad
name. I don't plan to read his past posts, just like I don't plan to
read yours. I don't need to read every stupid thing you've ever said to
know that I don't want anyone driven away. Can't you just ignore him?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 20:09 linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:12 ` Al Viro
2008-03-13 5:57 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 6:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-13 6:22 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-13 11:02 ` David Newall [this message]
2008-03-13 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 11:04 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:10 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-13 12:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 13:55 ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-13 19:40 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 20:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 22:50 ` Al Viro
2008-03-14 12:11 ` Stephen Clark
2008-03-14 6:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-13 10:50 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:23 ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-12 21:32 ` Al Viro
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-12 18:14 Xose Vazquez Perez
2008-03-17 18:36 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D909B9.40701@davidnewall.com \
--to=davidn@davidnewall.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jcpiza@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox