public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47DA6B62.5080103@seclark.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313225040.GO27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:10:01AM +1030, David Newall wrote:
>   
>> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>  Politeness is a good thing this list needs more of.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Do you honestly think we should be polite to people trolling on the
>>> LKML?
>>>       
>> I do.  It's obvious.  Rudeness detracts (and reflects poorly on one's
>> parents.)  Good manners cost nothing.  I might also point out that it
>> was bad manners, not any alleged trolling, which caused this sad
>> discussion.
>>     
>
> "Deliberate insult" would describe the original posting more accurately.
> Whether you prefer to look at it as a show of bad manners or as trolling
> is a matter of perspective; arguably it had been both.
>
>   
>> Don't be rude; rather say nothing.
>>     
>
> Request duly noted and denied.  For the record: condescending twits of that
> variety ("I can't be arsed to look at code I'm commenting on; here's my
> valuable insight that is obviously beyond the mental capacity of anybody
> here") can expect a harsh reply, whoever they are.  I'm yet to see l-k
> regulars treating newbies that way, BTW, despite the much decried lack of
> politeness.
>
> Since you are postulating social norms, here's one you seem to have overlooked:
> one who comments on code or design, be it review, suggestions of changes/
> improvements, etc., ought to read the thing he is commenting on.  Whoever
> it is and wherever the code in question might be.  And yes, it applies to
> kernel hackers commenting on newbies' patches to the same extent as to
> completely unknown folks commenting on the kernel, etc.
>
> Breaking that rule and being caught at that is one hell of a way to earn
> yourself a lousy reputation.  Combine that with arrogance and... well,
> there's a term for what you become: target practice.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>   
Someone once said:
"If you don't have anything good to say, don't day anything at all".

I have been reading LKML since the mid 90's and continually see people 
jump on
what are maybe dumb/stupid questions or trolls instead of simply 
ignoring them.

My $.02
Steve

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty 
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)




  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-14 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-12 20:09 linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:12 ` Al Viro
2008-03-13  5:57   ` David Newall
2008-03-13  6:12     ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-13  6:22       ` David Newall
2008-03-13  7:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-13 11:02           ` David Newall
2008-03-13  9:10         ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 11:04           ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:10           ` Alan Cox
2008-03-13 12:48             ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 13:55               ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-13 19:40               ` David Newall
2008-03-13 20:05                 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 22:50                 ` Al Viro
2008-03-14 12:11                   ` Stephen Clark [this message]
2008-03-14  6:05               ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-13 10:50     ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:23   ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-12 21:32   ` Al Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-12 18:14 Xose Vazquez Perez
2008-03-17 18:36 ` Xose Vazquez Perez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47DA6B62.5080103@seclark.us \
    --to=stephen.clark@seclark.us \
    --cc=davidn@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox