From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754092AbYCQMaz (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752142AbYCQMar (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:47 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP03.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.172]:37876 "EHLO e23smtp03.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751874AbYCQMaq (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:46 -0400 Message-ID: <47DE640F.3070601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:59:03 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Emelyanov CC: linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins , Sudhir Kumar , YAMAMOTO Takashi , Paul Menage , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, taka@valinux.co.jp, David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][2/3] Account and control virtual address space allocations References: <20080316172942.8812.56051.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20080316173005.8812.88290.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <47DE57C2.5060206@openvz.org> In-Reply-To: <47DE57C2.5060206@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > [snip] > >> +int mem_cgroup_update_as(struct mm_struct *mm, long nr_pages) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct mem_cgroup *mem; >> + if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled) >> + return ret; >> + >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> + mem = rcu_dereference(mm->mem_cgroup); >> + css_get(&mem->css); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> + >> + if (nr_pages > 0) { >> + if (res_counter_charge(&mem->as_res, (nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE))) >> + ret = 1; >> + } else >> + res_counter_uncharge(&mem->as_res, (-nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE)); > > No, please, no. Let's make two calls - mem_cgroup_charge_as and mem_cgroup_uncharge_as. > > [snip] > Yes, sure :) >> @@ -1117,6 +1117,9 @@ munmap_back: >> } >> } >> >> + if (mem_cgroup_update_as(mm, len >> PAGE_SHIFT)) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + > > Why not use existintg cap_vm_enough_memory and co? > I thought about it and almost used may_expand_vm(), but there is a slight catch there. With cap_vm_enough_memory() or security_vm_enough_memory(), they are called after total_vm has been calculated. In our case we need to keep the cgroups equivalent of total_vm up to date, and we do this in mem_cgorup_update_as. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL