From: "Jörg-Volker Peetz" <jvpeetz@web.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] convert a few do_div user
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:10:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E021B9.7030502@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313004902.866970953@linux-m68k.org>
zippel@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> This converts a few users of do_div to div_[su]64 and this demonstrates
> nicely how it can reduce some expressions to one-liners.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
>
> ---
> kernel/time.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
> kernel/time/ntp.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/ntp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/ntp.c 2008-03-11 17:15:14.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/ntp.c 2008-03-12 21:21:20.000000000 +0100
<snip>
> /*
> @@ -53,10 +53,8 @@ static void ntp_update_frequency(void)
>
> tick_length_base = second_length;
>
> - do_div(second_length, HZ);
> - tick_nsec = second_length >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT;
> -
> - do_div(tick_length_base, NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ);
> + tick_nsec = div_u64(second_length, HZ) >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT;
> + tick_length_base = div_u64(tick_length_base, NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ);
> }
>
Probably the compiler would optimize it, but maybe its clearer to change it this
way:
- tick_length_base = second_length;
- do_div(second_length, HZ);
- tick_nsec = second_length >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT;
-
- do_div(tick_length_base, NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ);
+ tick_nsec = div_u64(second_length, HZ) >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT;
+ tick_length_base = div_u64(second_length, NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ);
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-13 0:22 [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] cleanup 64bit divide API zippel
2008-03-13 0:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] introduce explicit signed/unsigned 64bit divide zippel
2008-03-13 10:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-03-13 14:59 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-13 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-14 17:45 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-13 0:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] convert a few do_div user zippel
2008-03-18 20:10 ` Jörg-Volker Peetz [this message]
2008-03-13 0:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] rename div64_64 to div64_u64 zippel
2008-03-13 0:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] remove div_long_long_rem zippel
2008-03-13 0:22 ` [PATCH 5/4] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 specifc div64_u64 fixes zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E021B9.7030502@web.de \
--to=jvpeetz@web.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox