From: Gabriel C <crazy@frugalware.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>,
andi-bz@firstfloor.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:55:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E420C5.1050407@frugalware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47E40B1C.30407@frugalware.org>
Gabriel C wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Gabriel C wrote:
>>>>> Also, can you please reapply the reverted clocksource patch ? I have
>>>>> the feeling that the acpi_pm one was the real problem which was
>>>>> triggered the modfied watchdog.
>>>> Sure I can , will do so in some minutes and let you know.
>>> It took a bit longer sorry but I have more infos now.
>>>
>>> The acpi_pm was not related to that I still get the problem.
>>>
>>> Of course I still can try to find the commit which magically fixed acpi_pm if you really want.
>> Just if you are really bored. :) I would have asked if it had fixed
>> the TSC issue.
>>
>>> It seems like it breaks only when you enable HT and only on 2 socket motherboards.
>>> ( at least the ones I own , I know is old hardware but worked fine for me )
>> Hmm. I wonder why a dual socket board survives the initial sync test.
>>
>>> Also disabling the second CPU and enabling HT works , enabling both
>>> CPUs and disabling HT works , booting with enabled HT and both CPUs
>>> but maxcpus=2 also works , booting with 2 CPUs and HT on breaks ,
>>> booting with both CPUs HT on but maxcpus=3 breaks also.
>>>
>>> Also I have another dual motherboard here 604 socket with 2 2,4 GHz
>>> Xeon's. The motherboard has the storage controller somewhat broken
>>> but for a quick test it is still good :) and I see the same thing.
>>>
>>> Does that make any sense ?
>> Not really. Can you please revert the reverted revert again and run
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/time-warp-test/time-warp-test.c
>>
>> on your machine with all CPUs and HT enabled ?
>
> Sure , doing so now.
>
Here the result on 2.6.25-rc6-00243-g028011e ( it was running 30++ minutes the time I was away for food =) )
...
4 CPUs, running 4 parallel test-tasks.
checking for time-warps via:
- read time stamp counter (RDTSC) instruction (cycle resolution)
- gettimeofday (TOD) syscall (usec resolution)
- clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) syscall (nsec resolution)
| 1.46 us, TSC-warps:0 | 16.01 us, TOD-warps:0 | 16.10 us, CLOCK-warps:0
...
Gabriel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-16 23:18 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-16 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-16 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-17 0:20 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-17 16:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-17 18:20 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-18 4:01 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-18 4:24 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-21 15:24 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-21 16:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-21 16:46 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-21 18:11 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-21 18:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-21 19:23 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-21 20:55 ` Gabriel C [this message]
2008-03-21 21:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-21 21:59 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-21 22:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-22 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-22 13:34 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-22 14:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-22 15:13 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-22 16:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-22 21:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-22 22:41 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-23 11:00 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-23 23:31 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-24 10:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-24 22:33 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-25 8:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-26 12:43 ` Gabriel C
2008-03-26 14:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-22 14:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-22 14:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-17 6:47 ` Jason Wu
2008-03-17 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-23 19:01 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-23 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-23 19:40 ` Chr
2008-03-23 21:17 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-23 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E420C5.1050407@frugalware.org \
--to=crazy@frugalware.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi-bz@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
--cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox