From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas@tungstengraphics.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: create array based interface to change page attribute
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:41:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F11443.7050302@tungstengraphics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F10C62.7040500@linux.intel.com>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>> Let me rehprase. Not really time-critical but it is of some
>> importance that CPA is done quickly.
>> We're dealing with the tradeoff of reading from uncached device memory
>
> uncached or write combining ?
The user-space mappings (the ones that we really use) are usually
write-combined, whereas the kernel mappings are uncached. (I think this
is OK since both mapping types implies no cache coherency). Even if
(IIRC) write combining is theoretically prefetchable, some devices give
read speeds around 9MB/s.
>
>> vs taking the pages out of
>> AGP, setting up a cache-coherent mapping, read and then change back.
>> What we'd really would like to set up is a pool of completely
>> unmapped (like highmem) pages. Then we could, to a large extent,
>> avoid the CPA calls.
>
> changing attributes by nature means a tlb flush and a bunch of
> expensive cache work.
> That's never going to be cheap, I guess it all depends on how much
> work you do
> on the memory for it to pay off or not...
Indeed. Actually with the new non-wbinvd() CPA, We seem to benefit
already if the buffer is a single page, though it's probably hard to
measure the impact of repopulating the tlb.
/Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-31 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-31 5:19 [PATCH] x86: create array based interface to change page attribute Dave Airlie
2008-03-31 6:54 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-03-31 9:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-31 11:04 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-03-31 7:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 7:55 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-03-31 8:38 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 9:06 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-03-31 9:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 11:10 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-03-31 16:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-31 16:41 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2008-03-31 16:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-31 17:26 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-01 20:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-01 21:29 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-01 22:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-02 6:30 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-02 6:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-02 6:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-02 14:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-02 17:57 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-07 18:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-07 19:51 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-07 19:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-07 20:46 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-07 20:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-08 6:12 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-07 21:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-08 6:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2008-04-08 14:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-07 20:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-07 21:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-07 21:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-03-31 9:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-31 11:21 ` Dave Airlie
2008-03-31 11:46 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-02 1:35 ` Dave Airlie
2008-04-01 18:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F11443.7050302@tungstengraphics.com \
--to=thomas@tungstengraphics.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox