From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
xemul@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sukadev@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>,
Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F530AD.3090706@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080403120406.dbc84cbd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely.
>>
>>
>
> Guys, what's the status here?
>
> afaict Manfred has identified an available-to-unprivileged-apps kernel
> memory corrupter? If so, we should fix it asap for 2.6.25. And for
> 2.6.24.x if it's also present there.
>
>
No, it's a priveledged-only memory corruption:
> int unshare_nsproxy_namespaces(unsigned long unshare_flags,
> struct nsproxy **new_nsp, struct fs_struct *new_fs)
> {
> int err = 0;
> [snip]
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
> Manfred's patch doesn't come close to applying against the 2.6.26 IPC
> things which we have queued but that's OK - bugfixes come first.
>
Where can I find the queued changes? Are they in -mm?
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-30 20:50 [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces Manfred Spraul
2008-03-31 7:12 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-31 16:14 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-01 9:44 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-01 14:15 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-03 19:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-03 19:31 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2008-04-01 15:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-03 19:40 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-03 19:44 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-04 4:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-06 15:11 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-06 16:26 ` [PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces, take 2 Manfred Spraul
2008-04-07 7:21 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-07 17:03 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-08 8:09 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-14 21:10 ` [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F530AD.3090706@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=Nadia.Derbey@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peifferp@gmail.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox