From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758898AbYDDPOS (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:14:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751485AbYDDPOK (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:14:10 -0400 Received: from ns.unixsol.org ([193.110.159.2]:39253 "EHLO ns.unixsol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471AbYDDPOJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:14:09 -0400 Message-ID: <47F645BF.4010901@unixsol.org> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:14:07 +0300 From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc6: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2510 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around 04/04/08 02:22, Rafael J. Wysocki scribbled: > The following report is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.24. Please verify if the issue is still present in the > mainline. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10346 > Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc6: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2510 > Submitter : Georgi Chorbadzhiyski > Date : 2008-03-27 17:29 (8 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/27/246 Upgraded to 2.6.25-rc8-00139-ge315c12, the server is running 8 hours already and it seems it's fixed. Anyway, should such warnings be threated as regressions? -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/