public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces, take 2
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:03:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FA53F1.1030509@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F9CB64.8040009@openvz.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 817 bytes --]

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> No, switch_task_namespaces is the wrong place to do this. It is to be 
> done in copy_ipc_ns. If you need a task for which a new namespace is 
> being prepared, then pass one into it.
>
>   
copy_ipc_ns() is also the wrong place:
There are calls after copy_ipc_ns() that can fail (e.g. copy_pid_ns()), 
and if they fail, then the whole syscall is aborted.
But undoing outstanding semaphore operations cannot be undone.
Or simpler: the copy_whatever() functions do not modify current.

Another option would be within sys_unshare():
sys_unshare() first creates all new pointers, and then actual unsharing 
is performed.

What do you think? I that the right place? The implementation could be 
moved into a seperate function, perhaps some of the NULL tests are 
superflous, too.

--
    Manfred

[-- Attachment #2: patch-detach-in-sys_unshare --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1274 bytes --]

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 0b45a4d..35841bd 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1298,6 +1298,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
 	if (!undo_list)
 		return;
+	tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
 
 	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
 		return;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 9c042f9..a3f3abb 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1733,6 +1733,18 @@ asmlinkage long sys_unshare(unsigned long unshare_flags)
 	if (new_fs ||  new_mm || new_fd || new_ulist || new_nsproxy) {
 
 		if (new_nsproxy) {
+			if ((current->nsproxy == NULL && new_nsproxy != NULL) ||
+				(current->nsproxy != NULL && new_nsproxy == NULL) ||
+				(current->nsproxy != NULL && new_nsproxy != NULL && current->nsproxy->ipc_ns != new_nsproxy->ipc_ns)) {
+				/* switching the IPC namespace is considered equivalent to sys_exit() wrt.
+				 * to outstanding SEM_UNDO undos: After switching to the new IPC namespace,
+				 * the semaphore arrays from the old namespace are not accessible anymore.
+				 * 
+				 * Additionally, an implicit sys_unshare(CLONE_SYSVSEM) is performed.
+				 */
+				exit_sem(current);
+			}
+
 			switch_task_namespaces(current, new_nsproxy);
 			new_nsproxy = NULL;
 		}

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-07 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-30 20:50 [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces Manfred Spraul
2008-03-31  7:12 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-31 16:14   ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-01  9:44     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-01 14:15       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-03 19:04         ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-03 19:31           ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-01 15:25       ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-03 19:40         ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-03 19:44         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-04  4:39           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-06 15:11             ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-06 16:26               ` [PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces, take 2 Manfred Spraul
2008-04-07  7:21                 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-07 17:03                   ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2008-04-08  8:09                     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-14 21:10               ` [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47FA53F1.1030509@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox