From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces, take 2
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:03:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FA53F1.1030509@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F9CB64.8040009@openvz.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 817 bytes --]
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> No, switch_task_namespaces is the wrong place to do this. It is to be
> done in copy_ipc_ns. If you need a task for which a new namespace is
> being prepared, then pass one into it.
>
>
copy_ipc_ns() is also the wrong place:
There are calls after copy_ipc_ns() that can fail (e.g. copy_pid_ns()),
and if they fail, then the whole syscall is aborted.
But undoing outstanding semaphore operations cannot be undone.
Or simpler: the copy_whatever() functions do not modify current.
Another option would be within sys_unshare():
sys_unshare() first creates all new pointers, and then actual unsharing
is performed.
What do you think? I that the right place? The implementation could be
moved into a seperate function, perhaps some of the NULL tests are
superflous, too.
--
Manfred
[-- Attachment #2: patch-detach-in-sys_unshare --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1274 bytes --]
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 0b45a4d..35841bd 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1298,6 +1298,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
if (!undo_list)
return;
+ tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
return;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 9c042f9..a3f3abb 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1733,6 +1733,18 @@ asmlinkage long sys_unshare(unsigned long unshare_flags)
if (new_fs || new_mm || new_fd || new_ulist || new_nsproxy) {
if (new_nsproxy) {
+ if ((current->nsproxy == NULL && new_nsproxy != NULL) ||
+ (current->nsproxy != NULL && new_nsproxy == NULL) ||
+ (current->nsproxy != NULL && new_nsproxy != NULL && current->nsproxy->ipc_ns != new_nsproxy->ipc_ns)) {
+ /* switching the IPC namespace is considered equivalent to sys_exit() wrt.
+ * to outstanding SEM_UNDO undos: After switching to the new IPC namespace,
+ * the semaphore arrays from the old namespace are not accessible anymore.
+ *
+ * Additionally, an implicit sys_unshare(CLONE_SYSVSEM) is performed.
+ */
+ exit_sem(current);
+ }
+
switch_task_namespaces(current, new_nsproxy);
new_nsproxy = NULL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-30 20:50 [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces Manfred Spraul
2008-03-31 7:12 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-31 16:14 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-01 9:44 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-01 14:15 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-03 19:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-03 19:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-01 15:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-03 19:40 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-03 19:44 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-04 4:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-06 15:11 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-06 16:26 ` [PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces, take 2 Manfred Spraul
2008-04-07 7:21 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-07 17:03 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2008-04-08 8:09 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-14 21:10 ` [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FA53F1.1030509@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox