From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753326AbYDHHJi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:09:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751445AbYDHHJa (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:09:30 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.175]:34822 "EHLO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363AbYDHHJa (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:09:30 -0400 Message-ID: <47FB193A.8070801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:35:30 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Menage CC: Pavel Emelianov , Hugh Dickins , Sudhir Kumar , YAMAMOTO Takashi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8) References: <20080404080544.26313.38199.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <47F79102.6090406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830804051023v69caa3d4h6e26ccb420bca899@mail.gmail.com> <47F7BB69.3000502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830804051057n2f2802e4w6179f2e108467494@mail.gmail.com> <47F7CC08.4090209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830804051629k3649dbc4na92bb3d0cd7a0492@mail.gmail.com> <47F861C8.7080700@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830804072337g2e7b4613hdcc05062dc2ca4e0@mail.gmail.com> <47FB162D.1020506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830804072357o2fd5e9bco3309d151e270e62e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830804072357o2fd5e9bco3309d151e270e62e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: >> I agree, but like I said earlier, this was the easily available ready made >> application I found. Do you know of any other highly threaded micro benchmark? >> > > How about a simple program that creates N threads that just sleep, > then has the main thread exit? > That is not really representative of anything. I have that program handy. How do we measure the impact on throughput? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL