From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Subject: Re: bootmem allocator
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:00:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FC5B7C.3020504@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080408080446.GA12308@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
>>> hm, bootmem allocator is supposed to clear memory. We have a couple
>>> of places that rely on that.
>> I was actually considering to change that for the GB pages hugetlbfs
>> patchkit, because memset for 1G is a little slow and not needed (will
>> be cleared later anyways) and it might be a problem for very large
>> systems with a lot of such pages at boot.
>
> changing the default behavior of bootmem alloc to be non-clearing is a
> really bad idea that will only cause unrobustness. The proper approach
> is to add an _opt-in_ API that does not clear memory
> (bootmem_alloc_dontclear() or whatever), available to callers that know
> it for sure that they dont need the clearing.
Yes, changing the default of bootmem_alloc is a bad idea. I just changed
a bunch of static arrays to bootmem alloc's and it was pointed out early
that not only does bootmem_alloc clear memory, but also panics if it's not
available.
> Also take into account that alloc_bootmem_low() :
> - calls panic() if not enough memory
> - already clears allocated memory
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
A specialized call to bootmem_alloc probably needs it's own API... ;-)
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 18:56 bootmem allocator Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-07 19:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-07 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-07 21:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-08 4:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-08 4:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-08 5:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-08 16:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-08 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-08 8:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 13:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-08 17:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-08 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-09 6:00 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-04-09 6:08 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-09 6:55 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FC5B7C.3020504@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox