From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756311AbYDJMdY (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:33:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755382AbYDJMdP (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:33:15 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]:16977 "EHLO mtagate3.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755061AbYDJMdP (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:33:15 -0400 Message-ID: <47FE0906.8080102@fr.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:33:10 +0200 From: Cedric Le Goater User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: sukadev@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , serue@us.ibm.com, "David C. Hansen" , Pavel Emelyanov , Containers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] clone64() and unshare64() system calls References: <20080409222611.GA28087@us.ibm.com> <47FD5899.2040206@zytor.com> <20080410010717.GA28477@us.ibm.com> <47FD6921.6090408@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <47FD6921.6090408@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > sukadev@us.ibm.com wrote: >>> >>> If you're going to make it a 64-bit pass it in as a 64-bit number, >>> instead of breaking it into two numbers. >> >> Maybe I am missing your point. The glibc interface could take a 64bit >> parameter, but don't we need to pass 32-bit values into the system >> call on 32 bit systems ? > > Not as such, no. The ABI handles that. To make the ABI clean on some > architectures, it's good to consider a 64-bit value only in positions > where they map to an even:odd register pair once slotted in. OK. I didn't know that. I took sys_llseek() as an example of an interface to follow when coded clone64(). Thanks, C.