From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@parallels.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"David C. Hansen" <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] change clone_flags type to u64
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:23:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FE14B4.4090705@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47FE1219.5010405@parallels.com>
Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> The was no real rationale except for some people seeing "clone" functionality
> as the match and the fact that FS_NAMESCAPE was done so made them believe it
> is a good way to go.
> And I warned about flags limitation at the beginning.
yes and now, we've hit the clone wall but that's a good thing.
> Both OpenVZ/vserver suggested to use a special syscall for handling this.
most projects do it that way.
> Maybe it is a good point to switch to it now finally and stop worring about all
> this?
what would be the interface ?
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-09 22:26 [PATCH 0/3] clone64() and unshare64() system calls sukadev
2008-04-09 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] change clone_flags type to u64 sukadev
2008-04-10 8:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 12:25 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-04-10 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 13:11 ` Kirill Korotaev
2008-04-10 13:23 ` Cedric Le Goater [this message]
2008-04-10 13:18 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-04-10 17:14 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-10 22:13 ` Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
2008-04-10 22:49 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-04-11 8:45 ` Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
2008-04-09 22:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] add do_unshare() sukadev
2008-04-09 22:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] add the clone64() and unshare64() syscalls sukadev
2008-04-09 23:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-04-10 2:15 ` sukadev
2008-04-10 3:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 0:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] clone64() and unshare64() system calls H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 1:07 ` sukadev
2008-04-10 1:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 2:38 ` sukadev
2008-04-10 2:43 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-10 18:26 ` sukadev
2008-04-10 18:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 12:33 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-04-10 16:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 6:48 ` Cedric Le Goater
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-11 9:58 [patch 0/3] clone64() and unshare64() syscalls clg
2008-02-11 9:58 ` [patch 1/3] change clone_flags type to u64 clg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FE14B4.4090705@fr.ibm.com \
--to=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dev@parallels.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox