From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
pinskia@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:07:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FE493C.2010709@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804101219170.7952@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Looking at the output below, shows that testing .sections in between
> #APP and #NO_APP would in fact catch this bug.
>
Of course, The Right Thing[TM] would be for gcc to emit .pushsection ...
.popsection around #APP ... #NO_APP.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-09 23:04 [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c Steven Rostedt
2008-04-09 23:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 0:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 8:47 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 9:46 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-04-10 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 14:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 18:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-10 15:05 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 15:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 16:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 16:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-04-10 17:32 ` Andrew Pinski
2008-04-10 17:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-13 15:27 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-04-10 16:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FE493C.2010709@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pinskia@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox