Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions

[Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>]

Adrian Bunk пишет:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 09:08:31PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>> On 13/04/2008, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>>  > On 13/04/2008, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>  > > This patch #if 0's the following unused functions:
>>>  > >  - sm501_find_clock()
>>>  > >  - sm501_gpio_get()
>>>  > >  - sm501_gpio_set()
>>>  > >
>>>  >
>>>  > Hi Adrian,
>>>  >
>>>  > I know we've discussed this before, but I have to comment on this once more.
>>>  >
>>>  > Why is it that you seem to prefer adding '#if 0' around blocks of
>>>  > unused code instead of removing it outright?
>>>
>>>> ...
>>>  When I removed unused code outright some people complained that they
>>>  plan to use it tomorrow or in the next millenium or whenever.
>>>
>>>  When I #if 0 it other people complain that I should remove it outright.
>>>
>>>  So whatever I do, there's always someone complaining.  ;-)
>>>
>>>  In this case the code looks as if it might get used at some point in the
>>>  future.
>>>
>>>  But if a maintainer tells me to resend a patch with the code removed
>>>  instead of #if 0'ed I'm always glad to do this.
>>>
>> But, you are completely ignoring the case of "the code is unused, but
>> will probably be used soon, so I'll just leave it alone and avoid the
>> churn".  Why? What's the point of commenting it out now and then
>> enabling it again in a month or two - isn't that just pointless churn?
>> ...
> 
> It's unused since more than one year, so chances are it won't get used 
> in a month or two.
> 
> As I said, if a maintainer wants me to remove it outright I'll be glad 
> to do so.
> 
> And as I said, no matter whatever I do, there's always someone 
> complaining...

It appears to me that if you had complaint statistics, that would have
provided a solid ground for choosing the right strategy for dead code.
Offhand, I have a feeling that the fraction of cases when the code that
has been abandoned long ago is about to be reused in near future ought
to be small.

Thanks,
Dmitri

> 
> cu
> Adrian
>