From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757786AbYDNTMI (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:12:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752552AbYDNTLu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:11:50 -0400 Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.200]:42584 "EHLO smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbYDNTLt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:11:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4803ACE5.4020502@keyaccess.nl> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:13:41 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Al Viro , Willy Tarreau , david@lang.hm, Stephen Clark , Evgeniy Polyakov , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tilman Schmidt , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Mark Lord , David Miller , jesper.juhl@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel , git@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection References: <47FEADCB.7070104@rtr.ca> <20080413121831.d89dd424.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413202118.GA29658@2ka.mipt.ru> <200804132233.50491.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080413205406.GA9190@2ka.mipt.ru> <48028830.6020703@earthlink.net> <20080414043939.GA6862@1wt.eu> <20080414053943.GU9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080413232441.e216a02c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080413232441.e216a02c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14-04-08 08:24, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:39:43 +0100 Al Viro wrote: >> I have a related proposal: let us require all patches to be stamped >> with Discordian *and* Eternal September dates. In triplicate. While >> we are at it, why don't we introduce new mandatory headers like, say >> it, >> >> X-checkpatch: {Yes,No} >> X-checkpatch-why-not: >> X-pointless: > the way to "68: aligns right ends of lines in comments"> >> X-arbitrary-rules-added-to-CodingStyle: (should be present if >> and only if X-pointless: 69 is present). >> >> Come to think of that, we clearly need a new file in Documentation/*, >> documenting such headers. Why don't we organize a subcommittee^Wnew maillist >> devoted to that? That would provide another entry route for contributors, >> lowering the overall entry barriers even further... >> > > None of the above was particularly useful. Does that mean you're not going to take patches that align the right end of lines in comments? :-( Rene.