From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932198AbYDOVCf@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932198AbYDOVCf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:02:35 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752551AbYDOVC1
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:02:27 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52417 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752230AbYDOVC0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:02:26 -0400
Message-ID: <480517DC.3060303@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:02:20 -0400
From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why 2 Kernel command line and module option parsers
References: <48045829.1090609@cn.fujitsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <48045829.1090609@cn.fujitsu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Shen Feng wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Now we get two Kernel command line and module option parsers, i.e.
> lib/cmdline.c
> lib/parser.c
> 
> I think we'd better merge them into one and make a kernel option standard since
> the kernel options become more and more.

Are you volunteering?