From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759459AbYDPCMw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:12:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752812AbYDPCMo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:12:44 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53107 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752127AbYDPCMn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:12:43 -0400 Message-ID: <48055FC7.2020100@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:09:11 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Barkalow CC: Arnd Bergmann , Alexia Death , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Problem: non-SDHC 2GB SD cards are unreadable References: <200804132326.07713.alexiadeath@gmail.com> <200804140245.33171.arnd@arndb.de> <200804140749.57049.alexiadeath@gmail.com> <200804140848.39226.arnd@arndb.de> <480343F2.3040401@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > Somewhat unsurprisingly, not all manufacturers took into account the > possibility that a card would use a different block size than what all of > the cards of the time used. > What's really kind of pathetic is that designed, in 2000, a that broke at 1 GB... -hpa