From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755911AbYDPHQv (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:16:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751256AbYDPHQm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:16:42 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:39070 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbYDPHQl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:16:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4805A798.7050004@firstfloor.org> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:15:36 +0200 From: Andi Kleen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Markus Metzger , andi-suse@firstfloor.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, roland@redhat.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, eranian@googlemail.com, juan.villacis@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support References: <20080408110158.A9336@sedona.ch.intel.com> <20080415173534.b746f8da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080415173534.b746f8da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Should we skip the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK check if capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)? FWIW I don't think we should. They are not really related. > It's a fairly large patch. The original version was much smaller -- a lot of the increase came out of review feedback for "more infrastructure" etc. I don't think you can blame Markus for that. -Andi