From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932320AbVHLFpm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:45:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932348AbVHLFpm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:45:42 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]:64751 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932320AbVHLFpl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:45:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QZzhsrzdoXsRpX2S5ck8Okkextlc1xwodu95pepFRpzUtWKEG3GwZyNWkFfBiyCVcQYRkQeVvf7FgPRiyMGJQyGCPWhroiC/9nJ1VHuKU0yNblm2E8nSyfNkWfqllqFfowKeXEKGswt1VF0P6XRaJVo7pGTNIEUPMH/5LY+Uczw= Message-ID: <4807377b05081122456418d62c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:45:40 -0700 From: Jesse Brandeburg To: "Stephen D. Williams" Subject: Re: Soft lockup in e100 driver ? Cc: Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <42FC1356.7080708@lig.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050809133647.GK22165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1123604182.15991.40.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20050809163632.GQ22165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <42FA9C02.3030406@lig.net> <42FA9CAD.7030607@lig.net> <20050811073946.GT22165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <42FC1356.7080708@lig.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/11/05, Stephen D. Williams wrote: > The chipset is an Intel 8x0 something. Unfortunately, there is a > heatsink semi-permanently installed over everything. Is there a /proc > pseudofile that will give me good identifying chipset info to report here? you can show the chipset details with lspci lspci -n will show device IDs and revision ids interesting failure case on the e100, I haven't a clue whats going on. netdev @ vger might be a good place to continue the discussion abut e100 issues.