From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v4)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:04:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48087217.50305@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080417164116.GB23351@Krystal>
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> +/*
> + * Only returns from a trap or exception to a NMI context (intra-privilege
> + * level near return) to the same SS and CS segments. Should be used
> + * upon trap or exception return when nested over a NMI context so no iret is
> + * issued. It takes care of modifying the eflags, rsp and returning to the
> + * previous function.
> + *
> + * The stack, at that point, looks like :
> + *
> + * 0(rsp) RIP
> + * 8(rsp) CS
> + * 16(rsp) EFLAGS
> + * 24(rsp) RSP
> + * 32(rsp) SS
> + *
> + * Upon execution :
> + * Copy EIP to the top of the return stack
> + * Update top of return stack address
> + * Pop eflags into the eflags register
> + * Make the return stack current
> + * Near return (popping the return address from the return stack)
> + */
> +#define INTERRUPT_RETURN_NMI_SAFE pushq %rax; \
> + mov %rsp, %rax; \
> + mov 24+8(%rax), %rsp; \
> + pushq 0+8(%rax); \
> + pushq 16+8(%rax); \
> + movq (%rax), %rax; \
> + popfq; \
> + ret;
>
I got this right first go? I must be getting good at this...
Anyway, trailing ';', and perhaps use a consistent form for mov (either
movq or mov in all three instances).
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-17 16:41 [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v4) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-18 10:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-04-19 21:29 ` [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v7) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-19 22:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-19 22:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-20 0:33 ` [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v8) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-20 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v9) Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48087217.50305@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox