From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] slub: add hooks for kmemcheck
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:21:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48092CFC.9090708@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804181604310.4046@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Hi,
Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> Should this not go into some kmemcheck.h file?
>> The implementations of these prototypes are in mm/slub_kmemcheck.c.
>> They are only ever called from slub.c since they represent the
>> interface between SLUB and kmemcheck.
>>
>> Would you rather have it in include/linux/slub_kmemcheck.h?
>
> Well lets see what Pekka says.
Well, I've tried to push for "generic" kmemcheck hooks so that they can
be used by SLAB/SLOB too but Vegard has always talked me out of it. Of
course, I have long forgotten the rationale.
But anyway, slub_kmemcheck.h sounds okay and I wonder if we should put
it in mm/ instead of include/linux/ as it's not supposed to be included
by anyone except SLUB?
Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Currently, with SLAB/SLUB debugging enabled, the page flag will be
>> cleared, then accessed in check_object(), thus generating a few
>> accesses to the page. It is safer to delay the clearing of the page
>> flag until no more accesses can be generated for the page.
>
> Hmmmm.. Okay that is already dealt with by a patch in Pekka's tree.
And merged by Linus now.
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 22:03 [PATCH 3/3] slub: add hooks for kmemcheck Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-18 22:27 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 23:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-18 23:21 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-04 13:44 [ANNOUNCE] kmemcheck v7 Vegard Nossum
2008-04-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] slub: add hooks for kmemcheck Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48092CFC.9090708@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).