From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1760904AbYDST0c@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760904AbYDST0c (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:26:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755205AbYDST00
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:26:26 -0400
Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:37039 "EHLO
	terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755179AbYDST0Z (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:26:25 -0400
Message-ID: <480A4693.3050208@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:22:59 -0400
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: w@1wt.eu
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.36.3
References: <20080419145327.GA23566@hera.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080419145327.GA23566@hera.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi !
> 
> I've just released Linux 2.4.36.3.
> 
> Nothing outstanding here, I've just decided to release pending fixes.
> Those already running 2.4.36.2 have no particular reason to upgrade,
> unless they already experience troubles in the fixed areas.
> 

Any reason to have 2.4.x.y instead of just 2.4.x+y?  I find it somewhat 
hard to believe there is substantial new development on 2.4, so it 
really should be all "stable".

	-hpa