From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759912AbYDTTp5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:45:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756141AbYDTTpu (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:45:50 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:3120 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756019AbYDTTpt (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:45:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WjKfbofYLfXrG/XkaeIqrxF6+op8LM3BTwvKTo9NDui3aYpiyYv3yXV1skaEhwi9ErUErGn6HSLGekeSMfoskSa3AmZK3lD5FBmKM70VBfmArBBIIYltXIy28gjo6WNQ4PbBHiNmxVBRuUdsYeQS4ziTskaTMUTN6ahuYyLS1UM= Message-ID: <480B9D67.7060606@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:45:43 +0400 From: Dmitri Vorobiev Organization: DmVo Home User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Andi Kleen , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: remove unused code and data in nexgen.c References: <1208660074-7324-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <1208660074-7324-3-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <480AC505.1030301@zytor.com> <877ies9x6b.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <480B9856.3040902@gmail.com> <480B9ADD.9060105@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <480B9ADD.9060105@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin пишет: > Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: >>> >>> Also NexGen was never shipped anyways, but bought by AMD and became >>> the K6. So I assume whatever this file is supposed to do is done >>> by amd.c anyways. >> >> IOW, you claim that now it's safe enough to throw away the NexGen >> altogether? >> > > If it never shipped, then yes, it should be safe to remove. We don't > support other vendors that never went to product, e.g. RISE or Montalvo. OK, then please drop this patch from the series (the other changes are OK, I presume), and I'll try to take care of NexGen removal with a separate patch. Thanks, Dmitri > > -hpa >