From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755750AbYDTWUZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:20:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751969AbYDTWUK (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:20:10 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50422 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750796AbYDTWUJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:20:09 -0400 Message-ID: <480BC191.6030905@garzik.org> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:20:01 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: kkeil@suse.de, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [for 2.6.26] ISDN cleanups, ok for upstream? References: <20080418225355.GA30189@havoc.gtf.org> <20080418164113.6863213d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080418164113.6863213d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:53:55 -0400 > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> I don't know the current state of >> akpm's pull of jgarzik/misc-2.6.git#ALL. > > oops. It seems that I disabled it quite a long time ago. I'll resurrect > it. Thanks! Though note that it will be temporary empty, after isdn-cleanups is sent upstream. If it's not too much trouble, I would appreciate you continuing to poll misc-2.6.git#ALL, even if it comes up empty. That tree (and branch) acts as an outlet for miscellaneous jgarzik stuff that may go upstream "vaguely soonish maybe" :) >> The 'isdn-cleanups' branch of >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git isdn-cleanups > > That merges cleanly against the small number of isdn patches which are > pending in -mm, so we're OK from that POV. Thanks for checking. Regards, Jeff