From: Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
To: serge@hallyn.com, David <david@unsolicited.net>
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 Kernel - Problems with capabilities
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:44:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480BE354.408@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080421000055.GA17510@vino.hallyn.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
serge@hallyn.com wrote:
| Quoting David (david@unsolicited.net):
|> Casey Schaufler wrote:
|>> Do you have a libcap that reflects the change from 32 capabilities
|>> to 64? You'll be looking for libcap.so.2.06 or thereabouts.
|>>
|> Adding libcap-2.08 and recompiling ntpd has fixed the issue, and I'm now
|> running normally, thanks!
|
| I don't understand why, though. Looking at the ntpd code (ntp-4.2.4p4)
| it just does a cap_set_proc(cap_from_text("X=epi")); It should simply
| be sending in the _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION which shipped with libcap,
| which should have been _V1, and the kernel should honor that so long as
| you didn't try to send in caps > 31, which ntpd wasn't.
|
|> Was this userspace visible change planned in advance for 2.6.25 ? ...
as I
|> guess a few other people with venerable old userspace components may
come
|> across this issue.
|>
|> Cheers
|> David
|
| It's been in the works a long time and we thought we'd done pretty
| well with backward compatibility. I really don't see why you had
| that failure!
I'm confused (and somewhat concerned) about this too. 32-bit capability
apps should act fine. The only thing you might notice is a strange
comment about it in /var/log/messages.
David, can you run strace on the failing program (configuration)?
[I'll see if I can read the complete thread on one of the archives and
see if anything else sticks out.]
Thanks
Andrew
|
| Do you know which version of libcap you had before?
|
| thanks,
| -serge
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIC+NP+bHCR3gb8jsRAjunAKDXe/fDfwIJWi6wgtpdxZefbRq5SACffb1+
pQNi1C/8PPGWYpUXFxizUuI=
=LHl0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-19 18:43 2.6.25 Kernel - Problems with capabilities David
[not found] ` <1208676743.4763.10.camel@marge.simson.net>
2008-04-20 14:09 ` David
2008-04-20 17:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-04-20 17:29 ` David
2008-04-20 19:08 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-20 22:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-04-20 22:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-21 0:00 ` serge
2008-04-21 0:44 ` Andrew Morgan [this message]
2008-04-21 7:20 ` David R
2008-04-21 7:01 ` David R
2008-04-21 18:34 ` serge
2008-04-21 18:48 ` David
2008-04-21 19:01 ` serge
2008-04-21 20:28 ` David
2008-04-22 2:42 ` serge
2008-04-22 5:29 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-04-22 5:54 ` David R
2008-04-20 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480BE354.408@kernel.org \
--to=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=david@unsolicited.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox