From: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: efault@gmx.de, manfred@colorfullife.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, xemul@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:59:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480C2D36.5050503@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080419232539.GE20138@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:17:02PM +0200, Nadia.Derbey@bull.net wrote:
>
>>
>>Here is finally the ipc ridr-based implementation I was talking about last
>>week (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/208).
>>I couldn't avoid much of the code duplication, but at least made things
>>incremental.
>>
>>Does somebody now a test suite that exists for the idr API, that I could
>>run on this new api?
>>
>>Mike, can you try to run it on your victim: I had such a hard time building
>>this patch, that I couldn't re-run the test on my 8-core with this new
>>version. So the last results I have are for 2.6.25-rc3-mm1.
>>
>>Also, I think a careful review should be done to avoid introducing yet other
>>problems :-(
>>
>>*WARNING*: this patch contains a fix for idr.c
>> I know, I'm doing things bad, but I only saw the problem this
>> afternoon.
>>
>>It should be applied on linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1, in the following order:
>>
>>[ PATCH 01/13 ] : copy_idr_code.patch
>>[ PATCH 02/13 ] : change_ridr_struct.patch
>>[ PATCH 03/13 ] : ridr_pre_get.patch
>>[ PATCH 04/13 ] : ridr_alloc_layer.patch
>>[ PATCH 05/13 ] : ridr_free_layer.patch
>>[ PATCH 06/13 ] : ridr_sub_alloc.patch
>>[ PATCH 07/13 ] : ridr_get_empty_slot.patch
>>[ PATCH 08/13 ] : ridr_get_new.patch
>>[ PATCH 09/13 ] : ridr_remove.patch
>>[ PATCH 10/13 ] : ridr_find.patch
>>[ PATCH 11/13 ] : ridr_integrate.patch
>>[ PATCH 12/13 ] : ipc_use_ridr.patch
>>[ PATCH 13/13 ] : remove_ipc_lock_down.patch
>
>
> And some more comments on the resulting ridr.c. Note that we might in
> fact want to keep the rcu_assign_pointer() calls that I complain about --
> see Johannes Berg's posting about making sparse smarter about RCU.
>
Paul,
Thanks a lot for the review, but I have in any case to rework my
patches: I have left calls to sleeping functions inside the
ridr_pre_get() / ridr_preget_end() section which is a very bad thing.
I'll rework everything and resend.
Regards,
Nadia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] duplicate idr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] Change ridr structure Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] Fix ridr_pre_get() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] Fix ridr_alloc_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] Fix free_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] Fix sub_alloc() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] Fix get_empty_slot() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] Fix ridr_get_new_above_int() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] Fix ridr_remove() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] Fix ridr_find() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] Integrate the ridr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] Integrate the ridr code into IPC code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] Get rid of ipc_lock_down() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14 5:18 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 7:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14 8:33 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 10:52 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 18:54 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-15 6:13 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21 8:07 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-21 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-14 13:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-14 15:01 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-19 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21 5:59 ` Nadia Derbey [this message]
2008-04-29 14:35 ` Nadia Derbey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480C2D36.5050503@bull.net \
--to=nadia.derbey@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox