From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762806AbYDURFT (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:05:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755182AbYDURFG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:05:06 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:54281 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754809AbYDURFG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:05:06 -0400 Message-ID: <480CC78D.3000202@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:57:49 -0400 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: Andres Salomon , Mitch Bradley , Yinghai Lu , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Joseph Fannin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jordan.crouse@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OLPC: Add support for calling into Open Firmware References: <20080418014757.52fb4a4f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419031024.GC3503@nineveh.local> <20080418202925.b18452c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419092544.378664a8@ephemeral> <20080419133909.5aa6b63e@ephemeral> <86802c440804200334t5cdcd100rfc41e9b1bf379109@mail.gmail.com> <480C0582.9010509@firmworks.com> <86802c440804202015h2605eff7vc733874dd1f22261@mail.gmail.com> <480C1286.3040307@firmworks.com> <20080421102417.6de71391@ephemeral> <1208793253.9212.507.camel@pmac.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1208793253.9212.507.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Woodhouse wrote: > >> However, until we clean up the promfs stuff, there's no chance of getting >> an OFW device tree upstream. > > I see no reason why we shouldn't be able to create a 'flattened' > device-tree during early boot, like the PowerPC kernel does. And use it > thereafter, having quiesced OpenFirmware. Haven't we already been > working on unifying this between SPARC and PowerPC kernels? > > I definitely don't think we need to play these tricks to keep > OpenFirmware resident while the kernel is running. Take a look at your > second patch -- it's _all_ just lookups in the device-tree, and you're > inventing a new way to do it instead of using the existing one. > If so, would this apply to OLPC as well? -hpa