From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763076AbYDURHM (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:07:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755231AbYDURG6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:06:58 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:57926 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754242AbYDURG6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:06:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XOdhewqpSkJ6k2ykLJrgBMvZISa2pia9I2TnIXmgoygbNYzHwy5ovQj0vdHCmGsJk4dUhEajWXyDk+LVVCvChNpJqY8ZI5AstDqkuBxj8BG3W0GFx4QA7d7hl0cSeTN9Of7eXZh5jtGIUZGRxRg7e0fd1P+mAGHIKsHf2N9ojos= Message-ID: <480CC9A4.9090503@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:06:44 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , "Paul E. McKenney" , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff References: <200804191522.54334.rjw@sisk.pl> <200804202104.24037.rjw@sisk.pl> <200804211812.16994.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/21/2008 06:54 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Jiri - could you also confirm whether you are usign SLUB (which is not > necessarily at all indicative of a SLUB bug itself - it's just that SLAB > won't ever even merge different allocations of the same size into the same > buckets, so if it's a cross-slab corruption, you'd simply never see it > with SLAB). Yeah, I'm using slub. Going to boot to slub_debug. Thanks so far. BTW. I haven't see this without suspend/resume cycle, do you, Rafael? It doesn't mean anything, since it needs longer time to trigger, but anyway, it might be a clue.