From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762555AbYDVIxM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:53:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759610AbYDVIwz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:52:55 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]:7820 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757176AbYDVIwy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:52:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DlhqnEewf+3Ek/qDrVB2YewWRFD/+CW2+g8qwBHOrIS1poSOm0Fzo96md9qAydF+2ev9PeO2+RRI/Xf8qmulGdRX2uaFugT/99AIEuuLo5rqt+KXfVEFybbTE8if1k0HarfY9MiFsRB9dS8pxT4LUVO2qNdgCyJnppsMKjqvepU= Message-ID: <480DA670.4060707@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:48:48 +0200 From: Jacek Luczak User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI function calls References: <1208851058-8500-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> <1208851058-8500-3-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> <20080422084738.GB2388@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080422084738.GB2388@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar pisze: > * Jens Axboe wrote: > >> This converts x86 and x86-64 to use the new helpers for >> smp_call_function() and friends, and adds support for >> smp_call_function_single(). > > nice stuff. The x86 and generic bits: > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar > > this has been brewing for months, what is the testing/confidence status A'propos testing: Jens did you placed all patches (latest versions) somewhere on net, so I can grab it and test? > of it? Could we still merge it into v2.6.26? (i think we should) -Jacek