From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763950AbYDVOo1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:44:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762455AbYDVOoP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:44:15 -0400 Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:1693 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759110AbYDVOoN (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:44:13 -0400 Message-ID: <480DF9BD.1080104@rtr.ca> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:44:13 -0400 From: Mark Lord Organization: Real-Time Remedies Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Jeff Garzik , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF References: <20080421213147.GH2633@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <480DE3C4.5@ru.mvista.com> <480DE6F5.8060403@gmail.com> <480DE9E8.2070809@ru.mvista.com> <480DEB1F.5060500@gmail.com> <480DF7B7.9030000@rtr.ca> <480DF876.7070800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <480DF876.7070800@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: >> Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>>>>> Jeff, Tejun, what "sff" in the file name actually means? Isn't >>>>>> it strange that the drivers lacking DMA support or not really >>>>>> compliant with SFF-8038i have to link with this file? >>>> >>>>> Maybe it should be libata-tf and libata-bmdma, but sff (sans bmdma) >>>>> and bmdma is acceptable, hopefully, right? >>>> >>>> What's sff sans bmdma? >>> >>> Supposed to be TF interface. IIRC, the SFF term was first from Alan >>> although it's entirely possible that I misunderstood it and used it >>> in the wrong way. Alan, can you please clear up the confusion? >> .. >> >> SFF stands for "Small Form Factor", as in the "SFF Committee Information >> Specification for Bus Master Programming Interface for IDE ATA >> Controllers Rev 1.0" >> from May 16, 1994. >> >> That document is basically a committee rubber-stamp of the earlier Intel >> "PCI IDE Controller Specification Revision 1.0" dated 3/4/94. > > Ah.. that means we have the whole naming thing wrong. Yewwww.... .. I suppose. If we were needlessly pedantic, then perhaps the libata-bmdma.c should be renamed to libata-sff.c, and the libata-sff.c should be renamed libata-tf.c But there's probably been a document or two since then, where the SFF folks have documented the TF interfaces, too. So.. whatever. :)