public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] sched: remove unnecessary kzalloc in sched_init_smp
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:04:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480E1A9A.6070301@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12c511ca0804220916i5c181202pecf8fee7153e54fc@mail.gmail.com>

Tony Luck wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>>  @@ -7297,6 +7287,11 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
>>   #else
>>   void __init sched_init_smp(void)
>>   {
>>  +#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
>>  +       sched_group_nodes_bycpu = kzalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **),
>>  +                                                               GFP_KERNEL);
>>  +       BUG_ON(sched_group_nodes_bycpu == NULL);
>>  +#endif
>>         sched_init_granularity();
>>   }
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 
> This hunk is causing problems with one of my builds (generic,
> uniprocessor). Note
> that the #else at the start of this hunk is from a #ifdef CONFIG_SMP ... so I'm
> wondering why we need #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) inside uniprocessor code :-)
> How can you have NUMA issues with only one cpu!!!

>>> CONFIG_NUMA is dependent on CONFIG_SMP for x86 so that caused me to miss
>>> the error.  But here's the fix:

  * sched_group_nodes_bycpu is defined only for the SMP + NUMA case,
    it should not be referenced in the !SMP + NUMA case.

For inclusion into sched-devel/latest tree.

Based on:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
    +   sched-devel/latest  .../mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.sched.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6.sched/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8028,11 +8028,6 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
 #else
 void __init sched_init_smp(void)
 {
-#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
-	sched_group_nodes_bycpu = kzalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **),
-								GFP_KERNEL);
-	BUG_ON(sched_group_nodes_bycpu == NULL);
-#endif
 	sched_init_granularity();
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-05  1:11 [PATCH 00/12] cpumask: reduce stack pressure from local/passed cpumask variables v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86: Convert cpumask_of_cpu macro to allocated array Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpumask: add CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR macro Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpumask: reduce stack pressure in cpu_coregroup_map Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 04/12] sched: Remove fixed NR_CPUS sized arrays in kernel_sched_c v2 Mike Travis
2008-04-22 16:16   ` Tony Luck
2008-04-22 16:42     ` Mike Travis
2008-04-22 17:04     ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-04-22 17:28       ` [PATCH 1/1] sched: remove unnecessary kzalloc in sched_init_smp Luck, Tony
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86: use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr function Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 06/12] generic: " Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpuset: modify cpuset_set_cpus_allowed to use cpumask pointer Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 08/12] generic: reduce stack pressure in sched_affinity Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 09/12] numa: move large array from stack to _initdata section Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 10/12] nodemask: use new node_to_cpumask_ptr function Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpumask: reduce stack usage in SD_x_INIT initializers Mike Travis
2008-04-05  1:11 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpumask: Cleanup more uses of CPU_MASK and NODE_MASK Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480E1A9A.6070301@sgi.com \
    --to=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox