From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760872AbYDVThx (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:37:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755169AbYDVThp (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:37:45 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.190]:62902 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754899AbYDVTho (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:37:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E9Tu33tff0xV7EnjHqaKO+IXGkirBf0MCGrl7hUtTMfmD4YOhrtqI/1GW/uvBQ0xj2iltagTaRu3dbh35P/LUDGYEvy+TmCZkV+P8vpafbWiS1+JaukLh4WTuOZ/VlseIOj1ILHr9Qq2dFDo0uQ9b5ryu/SxSXGPuFM0ak1tWEQ= Message-ID: <480E3E83.3050007@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:37:39 +0400 From: Dmitri Vorobiev Organization: DmVo Home User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: random clean-ups References: <1208660074-7324-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <20080421122504.GF6788@elte.hu> <90edad820804210541h26c8e66dh70895f32e4b4038d@mail.gmail.com> <20080422140203.GB24966@elte.hu> <480E3A00.7060401@gmail.com> <20080422192215.GA11665@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080422192215.GA11665@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar пишет: > * Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > >>>> This should be #1, #3 and #4. The NexGen patch, which was #2 in the >>>> original series, have been replaced by a bigger patch that kills >>>> NexGen altogether. Plese check, if you have time for that. >>> yeah, i did the right thing and described the wrong selection :) You >>> can check the end result via: >>> >>> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README >> ... which indicates that #4 is still not there, which is a pity, since >> the #4 patch gave me a more-than-negligible binary shrinkage for the >> case CONFIG_SYSFS=n :) > > oh, yes, i forgot - that collided with some changes to that file - > percpu changes and 4Kcpu support. I think we should delay #4 to a bit > later, when the other changes have gone in - or you could try to send a > patch against sched-devel.git/latest which should show the merged up > status of that code: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/sched-devel.git/README > > sched-devel/latest has all of the x86 tree 'embedded' in it - plus the > 4Kcpu changes as well. OK, let's wait till the things calm down a bit. The "sysfs disabled" case should be rare enough to not be in a big rush here. I'll resubmit this after the merge window has closed. Thanks, Dmitri > > Ingo >