From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757563AbYDWTCU (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:02:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753361AbYDWTCM (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:02:12 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:43826 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753425AbYDWTCK (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:02:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H62lcKGFMFj3KAZP/Os5siseOfE7lbUo4q3IhfcoPzY83t6y5klOG4IpOMF5Wbar0mPyYujLB5HBa66j7PkMF5XGPa56pFp/MxvdHehFt8lmrxF/wNns0PNQMfdaUr0/2EvQsfrQUaad8IdN4om5AfTViB22VvC+k3TGc8Stclk= Message-ID: <480F87AA.2080707@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:02:02 +0400 From: Dmitri Vorobiev Organization: DmVo Home User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: remove unused code and data in nexgen.c References: <1208660074-7324-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <1208660074-7324-3-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <480AC505.1030301@zytor.com> <877ies9x6b.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <480B9856.3040902@gmail.com> <480B9ADD.9060105@zytor.com> <20080423191952.77b56569@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20080423191952.77b56569@the-village.bc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox пишет: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:34:53 -0400 > "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > >> Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: >>>> Also NexGen was never shipped anyways, but bought by AMD and became >>>> the K6. So I assume whatever this file is supposed to do is done >>>> by amd.c anyways. >>> IOW, you claim that now it's safe enough to throw away the NexGen >>> altogether? >>> >> If it never shipped, then yes, it should be safe to remove. We don't >> support other vendors that never went to product, e.g. RISE or Montalvo. > > There are/were a few Nexgen boxes out there - strange beast where the > BIOS code emulated some instructions. So few I doubt killing it off is a > problem at all. The patch that kills the NexGen is already in Ingo's x86 tree, therefore the beast is dead, at least from the kernel viewpoint. Thanks, Dmitri > > Alan >