From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757043AbYDWUCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:02:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756268AbYDWUCW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:02:22 -0400 Received: from mail.AKNET.ru ([77.246.241.226]:50597 "EHLO mail.aknet.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755667AbYDWUCU (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:02:20 -0400 Message-ID: <480F95BE.60109@aknet.ru> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:02:06 +0400 From: Stas Sergeev User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takashi Iwai CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) References: <20080418014757.52fb4a4f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419021343.GA3503@nineveh.local> <20080418200237.b5a9e805.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419041429.GA8508@anvil.corenet.prv> <20080418212934.bbe84ee2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <480CD50F.20706@aknet.ru> <480E2EE5.5040208@aknet.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Takashi Iwai wrote: >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "PCSP: CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled, " >> + KERN_WARNING "which may make the sound noisy.\n"); > Missing \n in the first line? This was intentional - wanted it to print in a single line. You see a space there for that reason. Should the second KERN_WARNING be removed then, or what is the problem exactly? >> - Prevent pcspkr from being built together >> > with snd-pcsp. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev > Thanks, applied to my git tree. > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git > Meanwhile, we need to add a similar depenency to snd-pcsp as well, no? I personally don't think so. snd-pcsp has the excact copy of the pcspkr code built-in, so I thought pcspkr can be obsoleted in the future. From that point of view, having snd-pcsp enabled and not even seeing pcspkr in a menuconfig is fine. While otherwise (you ocasionally enable pcspkr and don't even see snd-pcsp then) is not fine. You mentioned earlier that you would like to be able to swap those drivers dynamically, but... what's the use? With such a dependancy added, many people will not even know about snd-pcsp as they already have pcspkr enabled. > Fixed on ALSA tree now. Oh...