From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757014AbYDYDwT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:52:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753284AbYDYDwM (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:52:12 -0400 Received: from mail.AKNET.ru ([77.246.241.226]:64244 "EHLO mail.aknet.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753199AbYDYDwM (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:52:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4811555E.3040509@aknet.ru> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:51:58 +0400 From: Stas Sergeev User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takashi Iwai CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) References: <20080418014757.52fb4a4f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419021343.GA3503@nineveh.local> <20080418200237.b5a9e805.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419041429.GA8508@anvil.corenet.prv> <20080418212934.bbe84ee2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <480CD50F.20706@aknet.ru> <480E2EE5.5040208@aknet.ru> <480F95BE.60109@aknet.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Takashi Iwai wrote: > No, I don't think input-pcspkr would be ever easily obsoleted by > snd-pcsp. People definitely want a system without the sound subsystem > but with a beep. If you don't enable sound, then you can't enable snd-pcsp, and so the pcspkr can be enabled. But if you have enabled the sound, what's the use in not seeing the snd-pcsp in the config? Because most people already had pcspkr enabled I guess, this just reduces the availability of snd-pcsp by an order of magnitude. And the reason for that, is... ?