From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758669AbYDYLlZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:41:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753402AbYDYLlP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:41:15 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:54346 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869AbYDYLlN (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:41:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I+sg8GJRjMsqaiPJbEKwPFh4OUZfRICuyX2cpV2u+wIhW11H9J30cbggMpYNEpUkCI+58Our7Mapg0Va9/nEB/0/oHccFMeRX+ExsMeWiCRbLWBMREYLiO+SYiuxmI0zAOToYvmXZ12s5GoLvZ7W0v6nxXDzBZrdnpGrSHCmMdc= Message-ID: <4811C352.5080802@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:41:06 +0200 From: Gabriel C User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Ingo Molnar , Priit Laes , linux-kernel , Jack Steiner Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] x86: support for new UV apic References: <1209098600.3707.13.camel@localhost> <20080425064405.GA23043@elte.hu> <87abjixo7d.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4811BEA1.502@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4811BEA1.502@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gabriel C wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: >> Ingo Molnar writes: >> >>> * Priit Laes wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> I am getting two following warnings (probable one per each CPU core) >>>> using the latest Linus's git: >>>> >>>> WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c:86 read_apic_id+0x30/0x62() >>>> Modules linked in: >>>> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-03563-gf7288b1 #20 >>> thanks - could you check the patch below, does it fix the warnings? >> I think it would have been better to change the WARN_ON to >> >> WARN_ON(preemptible() && num_online_cpus() > 1) > > Hmm , I think you are right , Ingo's patch fixes the warning on boot but now I get one when I reboot the box. > >> Preemption is actually ok here because this runs before the other >> CPUs are started >> >> Alternative patch appended. > > I will test your patch in some minutes. Your patch works better , at least for my box , 4 reboots with your patch and boot/reboot warnings are all gone. >> >> Don't warn in read_apic_id() when preemptible but only one CPU online. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen >> >> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c >> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c >> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ unsigned int read_apic_id(void) >> { >> unsigned int id; >> >> - WARN_ON(preemptible()); >> + WARN_ON(preemptible() && num_online_cpus() > 1); >> id = apic_read(APIC_ID); >> if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC) >> id |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits); > >