From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757742AbYDZPiD (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:38:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753921AbYDZPhv (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:37:51 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:42592 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753913AbYDZPhu (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:37:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VP6ybDk3LFrGXcvsswr3S+w7+bq3TBlCP/LfUJLBqxiX9BC6Y+yFg1kpapSV9tSD/uGxHhy/61amGdT2FHyqYCrehhtoIBgDHsdzwCPAF6cCKW1NLRK8J4Y3r2w0Wz4Clu8VOEZyUn/wGymphHkvhviGCq3oG/P3DHZgWm2yvz4= Message-ID: <48134C45.806@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:37:41 +0200 From: Gabriel C User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Arjan van de Ven , "Siddha, Suresh B" , Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 PAT changes References: <20080424225625.GB8717@elte.hu> <481330C6.7040109@googlemail.com> <20080426144203.GA19635@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080426144203.GA19635@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Gabriel C wrote: > >> Hi Ingo, >> >> When using an 64bit ( didn't got time to test 32bit now ) kernel[1] >> with PAT enabled , kvm-intel does not work anymore. >> >> When modprobing kvm-intel , kvm is saying VT extension is disable by >> BIOS which isn't true. When disabling PAT again ( no changes to BIOS ) >> kvm-intel works again here. >> >> Is that an known problem ? > > no, that side-effect was not known. Cc:-ed more folks. It seems like the update triggers some compiler bug. Setting CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n fixed that btw. I don't have the time right now but later on today I will compile gcc43_svn_branch and test again with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y and see what I get. Ingo sorry for the noise. Gabriel