public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
To: andersson@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	konradybcio@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: add native ipq9574 support
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:54:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4814455.tdWV9SEqCh@nukework.gtech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14283f23-31cc-4bf8-9762-f0348c30618d@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:28:11 AM CST Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/9/26 5:33 AM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> > Support loading remoteproc firmware on IPQ9574 with the qcom_q6v5_wcss
> > driver. This firmware is usually used to run ath11k firmware and enable
> > wifi with chips such as QCN5024.
> > 
> > When submitting v1, I learned that the firmware can also be loaded by
> > the trustzone firmware. Since TZ is not shipped with the kernel, it
> > makes sense to have the option of a native init sequence, as not all
> > devices come with the latest TZ firmware.
> > 
> > Qualcomm tries to assure us that the TZ firmware will always do the
> > right thing (TM), but I am not fully convinced
> 
> Why else do you think it's there in the firmware? :(

A more relevant question is, why do some contributors sincerely believe that 
the TZ initialization of Q6 firmware is not a good idea for their use case?

To answer your question, I think the TZ initialization is an afterthought of 
the SoC design. I think it was only after ther the design stage that it was 
brought up that a remoteproc on AHB has out-of-band access to system memory, 
which poses security concerns to some customers. I think authentication was 
implemented in TZ to address that. I also think that in order to prevent clock 
glitching from bypassing such verification, they had to move the initialization 
sequence in TZ as well.

Alex






  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09  4:33 [PATCH v2 0/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: add native ipq9574 support Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: drop unused clocks from q6v5 struct Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  8:31   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-13 14:27   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,ipq8074-wcss-pil: convert to DT schema Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  8:38   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: clock: gcc-ipq9574: add wcss remoteproc clocks Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  8:39   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: add IPQ9574 image loader Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  8:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: add wcss remoteproc nodes Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] clk: qcom: gcc-ipq9574: add wcss remoteproc clocks Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: support IPQ9574 Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: support m3 firmware Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  4:33 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: use bulk clk API for q6 clocks in QCS404 Alexandru Gagniuc
2026-01-09  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_wcss: add native ipq9574 support Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-09  8:30   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-12 15:17 ` Rob Herring
2026-01-13 14:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-14  3:54   ` Alex G. [this message]
2026-01-14  5:42     ` Vignesh Viswanathan
2026-01-15  4:50       ` Alex G.
2026-01-14 10:26     ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-15  5:27       ` Alex G.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4814455.tdWV9SEqCh@nukework.gtech \
    --to=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox