From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935898AbYD1Tr0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:47:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935564AbYD1Tqv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:46:51 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:45460 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937102AbYD1Tqu (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:46:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4816299B.5040002@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:46:35 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cyrill Gorcunov CC: Ingo Molnar , Markus Metzger , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: DS cleanup - dont treat 0 as NULL References: <20080428191504.GA6842@cvg> In-Reply-To: <20080428191504.GA6842@cvg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Actually I wonder why in original code Atom processors was > _that_ aligned? Was it made with a special purpose? yes, > it's a mobile platform, but can't see any reason for such > alignment. > [...] > @@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ void __cpuinit ds_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > ds_configure(&ds_cfg_var); > break; > case 0xF: /* Core2 */ > - case 0x1C: /* Atom */ > + case 0x1C: /* Atom */ > ds_configure(&ds_cfg_64); > break; > default: > Nevermind, I was looking for a *memory* alignment... :-/ -hpa