Re: [PATCH v2 30/31] coco/tdx-host: Implement IDE stream setup/teardown

Xu Yilun
2026-04-27T04:17:25Z

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 07:05:32AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2026 5:58 PM
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 08:02:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2026 12:02 AM
> > > >
> > > > Implementation for a most straightforward Selective IDE stream setup.
> > > > Hard code all parameters for Stream Control Register. And no IDE Key
> > > > Refresh support.
> > > >
> > >
> > > 'more straightforward', compared to what?
>
> a typo.
>
> >
> > Actually it is " *most* straightforward", I just mean "very".
>
> When you say "most straightforward", then I want to know what are
> other options to compare. If you think that the thought practice

OK, I think the use of "a most" is somewhat misleading. I don't want to
emphasize on comparison. I just want to give a summary about the
implementation: hard code all parameters, give no option for
configurations, no optional features supported e.g. KEY Refresh.

So is it better I just s/most/very:

Implementation for a very straightforward Selective IDE stream setup...

> leading to the 'most' definition is important, then please elaborate.
>
> otherwise I'd just remove that sentence.
>