From: Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@free-electrons.com>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:31:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4818205B.7050202@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48177D70.5010803@aknet.ru>
On 04/29/2008 09:56 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Reading the thread, it actually seems
> like Michael wanted to submit the patch
> much like the aforementioned one of
> mine:
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/1/18/580583
> but haven't done so in time, and as the
> result, the wrong one stuck in.
> But this is never too late to correct, I
> hope.
>
> So I see 2 options: either revert the
> patch completely, or revert the dependancies
> like Michael suggested initially (if I
> understand his suggestion right).
> Both patches are here, in this thread.
> Thoughts?
>
>
Stas, Dmitry,
I agree with you... on a regular system, all the platform devices should
be enumerated, even if we don't use their drivers. It's only for use in
embedded devices (CONFIG_EMBEDDED) that we could omit this enumeration
to reduce kernel size.
Would you post a patch doing this?
Thank you,
:-)
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-26 15:16 [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies Stas Sergeev
2008-04-26 23:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-26 23:39 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-04-27 4:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-28 19:34 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-04-28 19:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-28 20:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-28 20:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-29 19:56 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-04-30 7:31 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
2008-04-30 11:23 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-05-01 7:08 ` Stas Sergeev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-04 4:22 [patch][resend] " Stas Sergeev
2008-05-05 3:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-05-05 4:26 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-05-05 4:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-05-05 5:02 ` [patch][resend2] " Stas Sergeev
2008-05-05 11:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-08 17:50 ` [patch] " Stas Sergeev
2008-05-08 13:58 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4818205B.7050202@free-electrons.com \
--to=michael-lists@free-electrons.com \
--cc=Linux-tiny@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=stsp@aknet.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox