From: mkrufky@linuxtv.org
To: bunk@kernel.org
Cc: mchehab@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] dvb: build failure fix
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:32:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4818F394.9000807@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080430200139.GG29330@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 04:52:14PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:31:42 -0400
>> mkrufky@linuxtv.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Are there actually reports from users running into this problem?
>>>>
>> No.
>>
>> Yet, the configuration may be valid. If you have a board with tda8290, it
>> _will_ need another chip, like tda827x.
>>
>> In the past, both tda8290 and tda827x were handled by the same driver,
and
>> worked for analog only.
>>
>> So, IMO, this is a regression.
>> ...
>>
>
> drivers/media/ is the part of the kernel with the most fragile kconfig
> constructs.
>
> And we are talking about bringing a solution into -stable that has never
> and will never be in mainline.
>
> A compile error in a configuration without practical relevance isn't a
> huge problem, and I'd vote for leaving -stable unchanged.
I agree wholeheartedly -- we should not change the build procedure for
the -stable series.
I hope nobody was seriously considering throwing in this sort of monkey
wrench to a stable kernel.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 16:24 [patch] dvb: build failure fix Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 21:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 21:29 ` mkrufky
2008-04-29 12:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 19:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-30 19:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-30 19:31 ` mkrufky
2008-04-30 19:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-30 20:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-30 22:32 ` mkrufky [this message]
2008-04-28 19:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 20:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4818F394.9000807@linuxtv.org \
--to=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox