From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 11:08:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48196C58.4030004@aknet.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4818205B.7050202@free-electrons.com>
Guys, there really needs to be a
few more replies to make a decision.
So far only Dmitry have clearly stated
his opinion regarding both patches.
And that opinion was: no need for the
new config option, just get the 2.6.25
patch reverted.
Dmitry, after reading the older Michael's
thread, would you perhaps reconsider?
Sam and Michael said that just revering
may not be a good idea, but have not
commented on the patch that adds a new
option under "if EMBEDDED".
That puts me in a position where both
patches are effectively blocked, and
in a mean time snd-pcsp remains broken.
Guys, please, give your ACK or NACK on
the two posted patches! :)
Namely:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/26/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/26/283
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-01 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-26 15:16 [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies Stas Sergeev
2008-04-26 23:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-26 23:39 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-04-27 4:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-28 19:34 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-04-28 19:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-28 20:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-28 20:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-29 19:56 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-04-30 7:31 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-04-30 11:23 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-05-01 7:08 ` Stas Sergeev [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-04 4:22 [patch][resend] " Stas Sergeev
2008-05-05 3:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-05-05 4:26 ` Stas Sergeev
2008-05-05 4:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-05-05 5:02 ` [patch][resend2] " Stas Sergeev
2008-05-05 11:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-08 17:50 ` [patch] " Stas Sergeev
2008-05-08 13:58 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48196C58.4030004@aknet.ru \
--to=stsp@aknet.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael-lists@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox