From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] fs: use get_unaligned_* helpers
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 13:40:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <481AFDC2.7030807@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209700378.22362.23.camel@brick>
Harvey Harrison wrote:
> fs/partitions/ldm.h | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/partitions/ldm.h b/fs/partitions/ldm.h
...
> /* Most numbers we deal with are big-endian and won't be aligned. */
> -#define BE16(x) ((u16)be16_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__be16*)(x))))
> -#define BE32(x) ((u32)be32_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__be32*)(x))))
> -#define BE64(x) ((u64)be64_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__be64*)(x))))
> +#define BE16(x) get_unaligned_be16((x))
> +#define BE32(x) get_unaligned_be32((x))
> +#define BE64(x) get_unaligned_be64((x))
Why the double parentheses?
More importantly, I would say ldm.c should rather use
get_unaligned_be*() directly. No need to hide what these macros are
about by using a local alias.
After that, ldm.c should be inspected for whether really all of the
accesses are unaligned. If there are any which are guaranteed to be
aligned, they should of course be turned into be*_to_cpu(). But
separately from this conversion to get_unaligned_be*().
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -=-= ---=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 3:52 [PATCH 7/8] fs: use get_unaligned_* helpers Harvey Harrison
2008-05-02 11:40 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-05-02 18:17 ` Harvey Harrison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=481AFDC2.7030807@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox