From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934843AbYEBMka (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 08:40:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761112AbYEBMkW (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 08:40:22 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:39235 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759831AbYEBMkV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 08:40:21 -0400 Message-ID: <481B0B71.4090501@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:39:13 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Engelhardt CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: Who reverted 2.6.25 - stats References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt wrote: > One thing I noticed is that reverts are not always marked with the word > "revert" in the summary line even though it normally would be, IMO the summary line of a fix should tell what is being fixed. The changelog can then go on to explain how the fix works. For example, by reverting all or parts of a previous commit. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-= ---=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/